Social Media Now: Big Media’s War on YouTube, Chapter 639


Ok, we expect the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences not to understand social media, but Mark Cuban?

On Tuesday the Academy asked YouTube to remove all its Oscars videos (the Will Farrell musical number had been viewed a quarter of a million times before its removal). Yesterday YouTube complied.

The YouTube clips didn’t compete with video at Oscars.com, where a single, 5-minute recap clip is posted. Nor did it undermine any commercial plans for the video (because the Academy has none). Instead Ric Robertson, executive administrator for the Academy, yesterday told Variety that the move was designed to help manage the value of our telecast and our brand.

Kudos to Variety’s Scott Kirsner for his skeptical questioning which got Robertson to say that the move is “not really about business opportunity” and that even the video at Oscars.com will eventually come down to “whet people’s appetite for next year’s show.” 

Robertson offered no explanation for how a 5 minute recap vidclip with a short shelf life on the Oscars site would better whet appetites for next years show than a popular gag from the show distributed on the biggest online video channel seen by a million people over the course of a year. I guess the “Dick in a Box” video really damaged the SNL brand and undermined viewer interest in the next episode of the show.

Yesterday Mark Cuban–a long-time YouTube skeptic–chimed in on his blog with a suggestion for how the Academy should have handled YouTube.

Cuban’s idea is typically creative and smart: the Academy should have flooded YouTube with teaser clips followed by ads for Oscars.com and links back:

For this Will Ferrell clip, I would have created a video that showed the first 10 secs of the clip, then had 4 minutes of a billboard that said ” Great videos from the Oscars telecast and exclusive behind the scenes videos are all available at Oscars.com”

Great idea, but Cuban is still locked into old-fashioned thinking about brand marketing:

Youtube proponents want everyone to believe that every impression is a new found impression that can only benefit the brand. Others, myself included believe the opposite. That the last thing you ever want is for another entity, that is completely out of your control, becoming the de facto manager of your brand.

Of course millions of people watching the Will Farrell clip benefits the Oscars brand. Enormously. (Contributory media is part of the Web 2.0 watercooler conversation.) Furthermore it probably helps the Oscars brand reach an audience that is not reached by the TV broadcast. Most importantly the act of posting the clip, tagging the clip, emailing a link to friends, posting the clip to a blog–in short, the stuff of social media–marks an engagement with the Oscars brand that the Academy couldn’t generate if it tried. And, it didn’t even have to try. And it didn’t cost the Academy a dime!

If Cuban is worried about millions of people outside of a company’s control become de facto managers of every company’s brand, he better get out of the Internet business now. Welcome to the new world order.

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Social Media Now: The Battle Continues
What is Social Media? No, really, WTF?

Recent Posts


Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

[…] All I see at this moment is a group of people who are being left behind in the evolution of entertainment and are trying to be Canute as the tide comes in. They’ve created buzz, just not the kind they may have wanted. (There’s a good take at the Social Media Club) […]

[…] On Tuesday of this week, those behind the Oscars, the Academy, contacted YouTube and demanded they take down videos uploaded by YouTube’s users of selected scenes from Oscar night.  I haven’t watched any of the clips but Jason Chervokas blogging at the Social Media Club blog says the Will Farrell and Jack Black musical had been viewed over 250,000 times; it was very funny.  YouTube complied on Wednesday and all the clips have now been removed. […]

I agree, I think it’s time to face facts; people are in control of your brand, like it or not, so it’s best to play nice.

[…] I’d hardly call the BBC strategy a loving embrace of social media. In fact it sounds a lot like the one Mark Cuban offered yesterday: flood YouTube with teaser clips and links back to the mothership. […]

[…] Academy Yanks Clips from YouTube … Apple Opens Door (A Crack) to Indies: Yeah, the Academy says that clips being on YouTube diminishes the Oscar brand and that’s why they wanted them pulled. Of course users being users that didn’t last long. […]

all this big media trauma with respect to social media and the fluidity of web video is a huge advantage to the up and coming creators who aren’t stuck in old models.

i hope they keep their heads in the sand for years.