Why is it called Social Media - ‘Club’?


Jeffrey Keefer asked “I have also been thinking about the word “Club” in the title here, and wonder the history of the thinking behind that.” in the comments on my post about why I think the term for the industry/movement/era is ‘Social Media’. I was so focused on the term Social Media, that I neglected to explain the reason I thought it best to call what we are doing a ‘Club’ instead of an Association or something else. It really follows the same pattern of thinking I referenced in looking at 37 Signals and is reflected in my third post to this blog, Building the Social Media Clubhouse and the first post The first rule of Social Media Club is…

Merriam Webster defines a club as:

3 a : an association of persons for some common object usually jointly supported and meeting periodically; also : a group identified by some common characteristic club> b : the meeting place of a club club> c : an association of persons participating in a plan by which they agree to make regular payments or purchases in order to secure some advantage

Funny that the reference they use is ‘nuclear club’ isn’t it? For me personally though, it harkens back to a simpler era in my childhood - when I thought about clubs as simply groups I might belong to. I definitely don’t want to be thought of as a traditional association, but it is intended to me more than just an informal group. We want to find that middle ground - not too much structure and formalities, but just enough to ensure sustainability.

Still, we have been dinged by a few people over the past several months who think of the term “club” in terms of exclusivity - but then again, most of them did not do their homework in discovering that we have an open/free membership in addition to professional memberships. We think of this as an exclusive club because of it’s inclusivity. People are not joining because it is a limited opportunity only available to those with the most money - they are joining because there are like minded folks who realize that the amount of money you have does not determine the value you can contribute to the conversation.

Whether your purse is from Prada or Kirkland really does not make a difference in regards to whether or not I want to hear from you. Instead, what matters is your desire to find better ways to do things, to learn from each other, and more specifically, to expand the understanding and practical usage of Social Media across society - inside the enterprise, amongst individuals and between the individual’s and organizations.

It is a club in the spirit of comradery and common purpose - where tolerance, open-mindedness, truthiness and a willingness to engage in respectful dialogue are the most important values shared by its members. Hopefully, we are fast becoming the community center for the Global Neighborhood of people who are passionate about Social Media.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • MisterWong
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • YahooMyWeb
Sphere: Related Content

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
What is Web 2.0 (in 5 minutes)
SMC in DC - January meeting

Recent Posts

Word of Mouth Marketing Crash Course - Chicago, July 30th - Learn Word of Mouth Marketing

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

I like the term club. It reminds me of sitting around with neighbors when I was a kid in an open forum. After attending the San Francisco Social Media club it reinforced that notion. We sat around and talked openly.
Just dont add “Country” in front of the club.

When is the next SF Social Media club meeting?
mike

You left off that interesting and arguably dated reference from M-W, “.”

Interesting how we make assumptions, especially in interpretation of terms and word usage! I think you explained the term very well, Chris, and took it in a different direction than I initially had in mind. When I think of the term “club,” I think of those groups of kids who meet after school for some informal function, such as the golf club or the chess club. I usually do not think of the “club” in an exclusive way, though I see how others can.

I wonder how often this occurs with social media, especially since facial expressions and vocal tones are not always readily available.

Interesting that Mike was thinking along the same lines I was (as I worked on this post between work tasks). Along my point, I do not have the same lens of looking back at an “open forum” of youth, so that example is a bit foreign.

Regardless, I think it is interesting that the text from M-W I copied did not appear, just as must have happened with Chris’ copy and paste.

I’m relieved that you are referring to that kind of a “club.” I was fearful you meant the kind you use to clobber someone.

[…] So this is what I mean by ‘Club’ - a group of people who trust each other and are able to work together beyond the walls of their organizations, and connecting as independents within our growing global neighborhood. Together we can not only help each other be successful with our work, but reduce our expenses and have fun. […]